War Crimes and Genocide

The Nemesis Book

Unresolved Astrocities of World War 2

According to the Polish Institute of National Remembrance, Soviet occupation between 1939 and 1941 resulted in the death of 150,000 and deportation of 320,000 of Polish citizens, when all who were deemed dangerous to the Soviet regime were subject to Sovietization, forced resettlement, imprisonment in labor camps (the Gulags) or murdered, like the Polish nationals in the Katyn massacre.

The Katyn massacre was prompted by NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria’s proposal to execute all captive members of the Polish officer corps, dated March 5, 1940, approved by the Politburo of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, including its leader, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov. The number of victims is estimated at 22,000.
The victims were executed in the Katyn Forest in Soviet Russia, the Kalinin and Kharkiv prisons, and elsewhere. Of the total killed:

  • about 8,000 were officers imprisoned during the 1939 Soviet invasion of Poland

  • 6,000 were police officers

  • Polish intelligentsia that the Soviets deemed to be “intelligence agents”

  • gendarmes

  • landowners

  • saboteurs

  • factory owners

  • lawyers

  • officials

  • and priests.”

Would the Katyn massacre genocide, and war crimes be sufficient reason to declare war on those that perpetrated the crimes against humanity?

If the crime were done against Britain, United States, France or the Soviet Union, it is reasonable to think that such unprovoked attack would be viewed as an insult to their nation. The human and material loss would be sufficient reason to declare war on the perpetrators.

After the loss of the Pearl Harbour battleships, Navy vessels, the human loss of 2,403 Americans lives, and 1,178 wounded was a sufficient reason for American leaders to declare war on Japan.

Is the American and British Western logic and reasoning at fault to declare war on those that attack them? Is it not a matter of Imperialist National pride? That they would defend themselves if anyone dares to attack them?
The above conclusion is consistent to their logic, that which is valid and justified war for the Imperialists.

Why then would it not be valid and justified for the smaller nations to do likewise? If they have the power or the opportunity to do so? It is consistent with the logic and the rational, that the Western Allies used. In defense of their natural rights.

Finland defended it’s government and people by a preemptive strike, hitting back at the despotic Soviet leadership, the war criminals, the perpetrators of the war against peace in 1939 to 1940. There is no rational reason why they would not do. The decision was based on the Spirit of the Natural Law, and the natural rights, defending the people of the land.

Finland military took back the territory that rightfully belonged to the 400,000 civilians inhabiting the Finnish Karelian municipality. The Karelian civilians were forced to evacuate in 1939. On the other hand, Joseph Stalin and the USSR military Generals committed war crimes during 1939-1940, they initiated the aggressive war against peace, in Poland and Finland.
The USSR was operating under the Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression (1939-1941). They were committed to a conspiracy to do crime against innocent civilians, to the Baltic States and Finland. Where is the whistle? And who will blow it? War against peace is a war crime.

Thousands of people perished due to the Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression. The Soviets committed genocide in 1940, 22,000 Polish National prisoners were executed within two months.

It was an easy transition from the 1917 to 1939 Bolsheviks lawlessness worldview and Joseph Stalin track record of anarchy and extreme violence.
At the same time, France, England, United States were indifferent, and some 14 months later they became allies with those war criminals and providing the USSR with enormous amounts of military support.

UNITED STATES ALONE ASSISTED STALIN WITH US$160,000,000,000 (160 Billion in today’s money) MILITARY AND MATERIAL AID TO JOSEPH STALIN

JOSEPH STALIN WAS A PROFESSIONAL CRIMINAL

The Allied forces leaders were blind or repressing the true spiritual reality of the USSR leadership.
What were the Allied forces thinking? Of the Russian events in 1917, 1922, 1936-38, 1939 -1941? There is an enormous river of blood flowing from Russia, during that time period. Did anyone in France, England, and the United States consider the Spirit of the Natural Law? Why would they become allies with such record of lawlessness? (1917 -1941).

What have we learned from history?

The Imperialists, the Super States and the dictators have one thing in common, their own self interest.  They do not respect the Spirit of the Natural Law.  Therefore, it is reasonable to project into the future, that the Imperialsits, the Super States and the dictators will  be driven by the same motives that have driven them in the past history.  Making pacts and attempting to outmanouver their enemies and economical competitors in order to come out on top. At the same time they turn their back on the Spirit of the Natural Law, and become the violent aggressors themselves.

Buy THE NEMESIS Book from Amazon. Click link.