Many of us are dreamers, in 2018 become doers. Make your thoughts actions and become pursuers. Don’t make resolutions without an action plan. The secret to success is right in your hands.
Thomas Edison discovered more than 1000 ways, to not invent a bulb of light, But eventually, through perspiration, he found the solution to get it just right. If he had stopped at nine hundred ninety-nine, You’d be reading in the dark, and might miss a line.
Take the first step, do something outrageous, The act of doing, will become quite contagious. Accomplishments will come closer each day, Don’t just wish, but act and pray!
Don’t let pride ever cause you to stumble, Baby steps are still progress and keep us humble. It’s better to move slowly then to turn or hide, Keep your eyes focused, let God be your guide.
At the end of the year, you’ll discover you’ve been moving, Much closer to the goals, you have always been pursuing. It won’t all happen on January one, But with faith, hope, and action, you will get the job done.
In theory, the core ideology of socialism is when a population collectively owns and controls the means of production and distributes the result proportionally. The control is delegated to the State. While the distribution usually comes in the form of underlying social welfare to satisfy everyone’s basic needs, like housing, education, and healthcare.
The ideal’s end goal and purpose of socialism were to guarantee a level playing field for members of society, thereby removing class distinctions based on ownership. In reality, it was like a one-sided coin.
An ideology that was rooted in unbelief, lawlessness, and atheism. The founders resorted to rebellion, violence, and anarchy. Committing murder for their godless political ends. USSR was a vile manifestation of the erroneous human carnal nature, heart, and mind corruption. The only objective for the fruits of the sinful man and the Nemesis of humanity to manifest on earth.
THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION TO COMMUNIST
Their ideology was delusional, and it was a purely materialistic worldview; it became defined as a Dialectic Materialism philosophy, not people-centered with spiritual values, but instead purely 100% materialistic worldview.
THE SOURCE OF KARL MARX CREED?
Karl Marx had a Jewish heritage, but he deliberately turned 180 degrees around from the (1) supernaturalism and (2) distinctiveness of his Jewish heritage to embrace (1) atheism and (2) communist ideology. Marxism retains all the major structural and emotional factors of biblical religion in a secularized form. He is a false prophet in every sense of the word. (Encyclopedia, Karl Marx, 2018)
MOSES.
“So remember that the Lord is the only true Elohim, whether in the sky above or on the earth below.” Deuteronomy 4: 39. (1446 BC)
KARL MARX DOCTRINE
” Marx, like Moses, is the prophet who leads the new Chosen People, the proletariat, out of the slavery of capitalism into the Promised Land of communism across the Red Sea of bloody worldwide revolution and through the wilderness of temporary, dedicated suffering for the party, the new priesthood.”
“The revolution is the new “Day of Yahweh,” the Day of Judgment; The party spokesmen are the new prophets, and political purges within the party to maintain ideological purity are the new divine judgments on the waywardness of the Chosen and their leaders. The messianic tone of communism makes it structurally and emotionally more like a religion than any other political system except fascism”.
“Just as Marx took over the forms and the spirit of his religious heritage, but not the content, he did the same with his Hegelian philosophical heritage, transforming Hegel’s philosophy of “dialectical idealism” into “dialectical materialism!”
“Marx stood Hegel on his head,” the saying goes. Marx inherited seven radical ideas from Hegel:
Monism: the idea that everything is one and that common sense’s distinction between matter and spirit is illusory. For Hegel, the matter was only a form of spirit; for Marx, the spirit was only a form of matter.
Pantheism: the notion that the distinction between Creator and creature, the distinctively Jewish idea, is false. For Hegel, the world is made into an aspect of God (Hegel was a pantheist); for Marx, God was reduced to the world (Marx was an atheist).
Historicism: the idea that everything changes, even truth; that there is nothing above history to judge it; and that therefore what is right in one era becomes false in another, or vice versa. In other words, Time is God.
Dialectic: the idea that history moves only by conflicts between opposing forces, a “thesis” vs. an “antithesis” evolving a “higher synthesis.” This applies to classes, nations, institutions, and ideas. The dialectic waltz plays on in history’s ballroom until the kingdom of God finally comes-which Hegel virtually identified with the Prussian State.
Marx internationalized it to the worldwide communist State.
Necessitarianism, or fatalism: the idea that the dialectic and its outcome are inevitable and necessary, not free. Marxism is a sort of Calvinistic predestination without a divine Predestinator.
Statism: the idea that since there is no eternal, trans-historical truth or law, the State is supreme and uncriticizable. Marx again internationalized Hegel’s nationalism here.
Militarism: the idea that since there is no universal natural or eternal law above states to judge and resolve differences between them, war is inevitable and necessary as long as there are states.” (Kreeft, 2018) www.peterkreeft.com/ pillars_marx.
A CLAIM FOR A TRUE WORLDVIEW.
SOVIET UNION BEGINNINGS 1900-1917
The Soviet Union had its ideological and nationalistic roots in the Russian unrest years that started bubbling in the Russian human souls during the demonstrations of 1905. The failure of the Russian leadership to deliver anything significant to the nationalistic fever that they had when they went into World War 1.
They experienced setbacks at the front lines, with enormous losses to the military soldiers and the society at large. The Russian souls came back to their senses and reacted with violence and lawlessness against their nation’s monarchy and leaders. Those circumstances were ideal for the Nemesis to get a grip on the people and lead them further into rebellion, lawlessness, and anarchy.
That enabled more of the revolution fever momentum led by Vladimir Lenin to overthrow the Russian Tsar and the Provisional Government in Petersburg. They were determined with the spirit of the revolution fever to overthrow the established authorities. It was blatant anarchy, which violated the rule of law principles.
The primary spiritual driver of the USSR ideology was the Nemesis, the lawless one called Satan.
“He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years. He threw him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore until the thousand years were ended.”
Revelation 20: 2, 3.
“For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and the presumption is as iniquity and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of the Lord, he has also rejected you from being king.”
1 Samuel 15: 23. (ESV)
“An evil man seeks only rebellion, and a cruel messenger will be sent against him.”
Proverbs 17: 11. (ESV)
SOWING SEEDS OF REBELLION
The Bolsheviks were determined to overthrow the Russian Monarchy; they worked at it for some 17 years. The provisional Government eventually replaced Tsar Nicholas II towards the end of World War I. It was the beginning of 1900, with the unrest in Russian society manifesting with demonstrations of soldiers and civilians. That led to a rebellious and lawless revolution spirit that the Bolsheviks fed and perpetuated to their advantage.
The Bolsheviks-minded agitators worked to get the political support of the people with momentum for a better future; their victories would blossom for a brief moment and then would finally implode into the full-blown anarchy of the Russian Civil War, lasting four years, and 2 million people dead. It was later refined and proudly declared as State Atheism with collective communism.
The totalitarian regime disconnected itself from the Spirit of the Natural Law. The State Atheism remained so until Adolf Hitler’s military forces started knocking at the gates of Moscow. It soon changed Stalin’s attitude towards religion. The churches, the believers that they had been mocking, suppressing, murdering, and imprisoned the pastors. Desecrating and destroying the church buildings. The Russian people were once again, after 1941, allowed to go and pray to God openly for a brighter Russian future. Stalin’s wilful atheism gave way to the reality of God’s sovereignty over the affairs of men. It is almost ironic that the arrogance of Stalin during 1939-41 soon boomeranged back; he received what he had willfully committed himself. Deliberately ordered the executions of innocent victims in Poland and orchestrated a war against peace in Poland, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
Just like the Pharaoh of Egypt, when his arrogance and hard-hearted attitude rebounded, after 1945, when the allied forces supported Stalin to fight back the Nazi Germany military invasion. There is a direct correlation between the 1939 Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression with Stalin’s violent actions against the innocent victims in the war against peace, against Poland and Finland. They were war crimes against the Baltic States and genocide against Polish nationals in 1940. There can be seen a direct judgment of God visible for all to see. In the crime does not pay principle. Both Hitler and Stalin planned war crimes and genocide from 1939 to 1940. From the partnership in the conspiracy, 1939 Molotov & Ribbentrop Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression, that did turn against Stalin in 1941. Stalin was punished for his 40 years of lawlessness, anarchy, arrogance, cruelty, and violence. Hitler likewise was punished and eventually destroyed in 1945. Stalin’s arrogance, idolatry, and war crimes live on in the inner circles of the Russian leadership.
That is the spirit that enables lawlessness at the government lever, Ukraine territory annexation in East Ukraine, Ukraine Crimea Peninsula occupation, and the Russian activities in Syria, are only possible when the leaders are motivated by the spirit of rebellion, lawlessness, and anarchy. The same spirit as the Bolsheviks Revolution and the USSR State Atheism.
Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler’s war crimes and sins do not live on; they died in Nuremberg 1945, in the court of law, with the conviction of the war criminals, the guilt of crime is therefore removed by the admission and confession of the crime in the court of law.
The penalty, restitution, or the sentence is an acknowledgment of the guilty agent having broken the Spirit of the Natural Law. The same cannot be said for Soviet Russian war crimes. Russia is still profiteering from the Soviet Stalin’s 1939-45 war crimes in 2018.
The current Russian leadership and the Russian spirit of nationalism are proud of Stalin. Stalin’s Soviet Union is looked up to and esteemed as a great model for the Russian future. Carnal hearts and minds can only appreciate it, when it is disconnected from the Spirit of the Natural Law.
The carnal nature of the human mind and heart often glorifies the dishonest gain, just like Stalin did in 1939, 1941. Soviet and Russian leaders have not acknowledged their 1939 – 1945 war crimes. Therefore, they are still outstanding war crimes. Why would they not be? Only people living in denial of the spiritual reality would suppress or repress facts.
It is an old spiritual truth from the book of Proverbs chapter 16, verse 4.
“The LORD has made everything for its own purpose, Even the wicked for the day of evil.”
Adolf Hitler was used by God to achieve his goals, according to his Holiness.
Matthew Henry’s Commentary on Proverbs 16: 4.
“God makes use of the wicked to execute righteous vengeance on each other, and he will be glorified by their destruction at last.” “Though sinners strengthen themselves and one another, they shall not escape God’s judgments. “By the mercy and truth of God in Christ Jesus, the sins of believers are taken away, and the power of sin is broken. “He that has all hearts in his hand can make a man’s enemies be at peace with him.” “A small estate, honestly come by, will turn to better account than a great estate ill-gotten.” “If men make God’s glory their end, and his will their rule, he will direct their steps by his Spirit and grace.” “Let kings and judges of the earth be just, and rule in fear of God.” “To observe justice in dealings between man and man is God’s appointment.”
Political theory has little meaning and value for people if human lives become worthless. The theory of Karl Marx, Lenin, and Stalin are unthinkable as rational theories for the people of a nation. They declared State atheism from the beginning, idolatrous core philosophy. Without any respect for God’s Creation, made in the image of God. The intrinsic value of human life with God-given rights. In their ideology, there was no acknowledgment of human beings created in the image of God and therefore having no God-given respect and human worth. That was a severe error of judgment. It only appealed to those who wanted quick results without work, and were rebellious and given to lawlessness. It was a sure sign of the influence of the Nemesis.
NEMESIS IDENTIFIED
What are the ancient old patterns of human history? That causes the living human souls to break down? Furthermore, the human soul in a broken state, in turn, inflicts suffering on other human beings? It is seen in the fragmentation of the living soul mind functions, the intellect, consciousness, imagination, will, memory, and emotions.
Victor Leinonen. A Claim For A True Worldview (Kindle Locations 1521-1530).
A CLAIM FOR A TRUE WORLDVIEW
Buy This Book Today.
Thank you for visiting The Nemesis Book website and reading this UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS SOCIALISM AND DIALECTIC THEORY article post. We hope it was useful, practical and helpful. For more similar articles please do visit http://aclaimforatrueworldview.com/ website.
“Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment.”
Principle II
“The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.”
Principle III
“The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.”
Principle IV
Main article: Superior orders
“The fact that a person acted under the order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law provided a moral choice be in fact possible to him.”
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: “It is not an acceptable excuse to say ‘I was just following my superior’s orders.’”
Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as “Superior Orders.” After the prominent, high- profile event of the Nuremberg Trials, that excuse is now referred to by many as the “Nuremberg Defense.” In recent times, a third term, “lawful orders” has become common parlance for some people. All three terms are in use today, and they all have slightly different nuances of meaning, depending on the context in which they are used.
Nuremberg Principle IV is legally supported by the jurisprudence found in individual articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which deal indirectly with conscientious objection. It is also supported by the principles found in paragraph 171 of the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status which was issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Those principles deal with the conditions under which conscientious objectors can apply for refugee status in another country if they face persecution in their own country for refusing to participate in an illegal war.
Principle V
“Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.”
Principle VI
“The crimes from now on set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
Crimes against peace:
Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances; participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done, or such persecutions are carried on in the execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.”
Principle VII“Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as outlined in Principle VI is a crime under international law.” (Nuremberg_principles, 1945)
The above Nuremberg Trials was the bases for convinced the Nazi Germany Officers for their part in the conspiracy to commit war crimes. Likewise the Soviet Union -Russian leaders need to judge according to the same standards of the International law and the moral code. According to the Spirit of the Natural Law. Nothing more, nothing less, that is the Spirit of true justice.
FINLAND UNDER PERSECUTION
The following text is from The Nemesis Book 2018.
“There is much evidence to prove that the Allied forces cowered before the Soviet Union leaders. Moreover, given his powers to do as he and the Nemesis wished on the Baltic States and The war-responsibility trials in Finland 1945,1946.
(Encyclopedia, War-responsibility trials in Finland, 1945)
The most obvious follow up the question in regard to the War-responsibility trials in Finland are these:
Where were the War-responsibility trials of Soviet Union Russian 1939-1940 held?
Where were the War-responsibility trials of Poland’s Katyn Forest massacre held?
Where and when were they held?
When will the United States and England 1941-1945 war-responsibility trials be held?
The Western Alliance have often said they were the principled people? And that they are pretentiously strutting on a hypocritical, double standard moral high ground.
That is the essence that they are referring to in the International War Crime Court of Nuremberg. They continue to arrest the Nazi Germany war criminals from 1939 – 1945. They arrest the Nazi German officers and take them out of the aged people homes at the old age over 80 to 90’s. On what basis are the old and frail being arrested?
However, their judgment is one-sided and biased as the drunken despots were biased in Berlin 1945,1946. Russian soldiers are raping the citizen women of Berlin, approved by their officers. (Rape, 1945).
In the following chapter is the Axis personnel indicted for war crimes. The following is a list of War Crime Trials and the people suspected of committing war crimes on behalf of Nazi Germany or any of the Axis.”
“The just war theory is central to this example. When is justified for a State government toemploy military force against another State?
Is there any difference in
the Spirit of the Natural Law principles between a small nation of 3 million,
and the national population of 150 million?
In the Natural Law theory,
the principles are constant, regardless of the population size. The law of the
jungle logic may see that size difference as an opportunity for the bigger to
exploit the smaller.
“Just war
theory today is a composite that has evolved from ideas developed by various
religious figures. In the 5th century, St. Augustine discussed in the City of
God the circumstances under which killing could be justified, and empires
legitimately expanded.” (Encyclopedia, Just War Theory, 426 AD)
In the 13th century, St.
Thomas Aquinas laid out a more elaborate just war doctrine in his Summa
Theologica. He wrote that three conditions were necessary to make a war just:
a competent
authority must order it;
the cause
must be just;
moreover, the
combatants must have “a right intention so that they intend the advancement of
good or the avoidance of evil.
Modern just
war guidance involves both the decision to go to war (jus ad bellum) and how to
fight one (jus in bello). This latter set of criteria focuses on
proportionality (how much force), targeting (avoiding non- combatants), and
means (avoiding certain classes of weapons).
WARS OF
CHOICE
“The question is whether wars of choice can also be justifiable. By definition, wars of choice tend toinvolve less than vital interests and the existence of alternative policies.Vietnam, Kosovo, and Bosnia were all wars of choice. So too was the second Iraqwar which began in 2003.
Are wars of choice ever justifiable?
The answer is “yes,” when using force is the best available policy option. The
argument that the goal is worthy, and that war is the best option for pursuing
it should be strong enough to garner considerable domestic and international
support. More important, the case should be persuasive that using military
force will accomplish more good for more people at a lower cost than diplomacy,
sanctions, or inaction.
However, what about the
future? The concept of justifiable war is not merely one for history. Iran,
North Korea, Pakistan, Afghanistan, all are potential theaters for new or
intensified U.S. military action. The question is not whether they would
constitute just wars. That is too impractical a standard. The question in the
real world is whether they would be justifiable to Congress, to the American
people, to the world. It is a question the next President will have to answer.”
(Richard.N.Hass, 2009)
AMERICAN PRONOUNCE WAR
ON JAPAN
Speech by the American
President Roosevelt.
President
Franklin Roosevelt called the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor a “date which
will live in infamy,” in a famous address to the nation delivered on December
8, 1941, after Japan’s deadly surprise attack against U.S. naval and military
forces in Hawaii. He also asked the Congress to declare war on Japan.
“The attack
on Pearl Harbor was a surprise military strike by the Imperial Japanese Navy
Air Service against the United States naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
Territory, on the morning of December 7, 1941.
Japan
intended the attack as a preventive action to keep the U.S. Pacific Fleet from
interfering with military actions that were planned in Southeast Asia against
overseas territories of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and the United
States.
All eight
U.S. Navy battleships were damaged, with four sunk. All but the USS Arizona
were later raised, and six were returned to service and went on to fight in the
war. The Japanese also sank or damaged three cruisers, three destroyers, an
anti-aircraft training ship, and one minelayer. One hundred eighty-eight U.S.
aircraft were destroyed; 2,403 Americans were killed, and 1,178 others were
wounded.
The surprise
attack came as a profound shock to the American people and led directly to the
American entry into World War II in both the Pacific and European theaters. The
following day, December 8, the United States declared war on Japan, “Yesterday,
December 7th, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of
America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the
Empire of Japan.
The United
States was at peace with that nation and, at the solicitation of Japan, was
still in conversation with its government and its emperor looking toward the
maintenance of peace in the Pacific.
Indeed, one
hour after Japanese air squadrons had commenced bombing in the American island
of Oahu, the Japanese ambassador to the United States and his colleague
delivered to our Secretary of State a formal reply to a recent American
message. Moreover, while this reply stated that it seemed useless to continue
the existing diplomatic negotiations, it contained no threat or hint of war or
armed attack.
It will be
recorded that the distance of Hawaii from Japan makes it evident that the
attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks ago.
During the
intervening time, the Japanese government has deliberately sought to deceive
the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued
peace.
The attack
yesterday on the Hawaiian islands has caused severe damage to American naval
and military forces. I regret to tell you that very many American lives have
been lost. Also, American ships have been reported torpedoed on the high seas
between San Francisco and Honolulu.
Yesterday,
the Japanese government also launched an attack against Malaya.
Last night,
Japanese forces attacked Hong Kong. Last night, Japanese forces attacked Guam.
Last night,
Japanese forces attacked the Philippine Islands. Last night, the Japanese
attacked Wake Island.
Moreover,
this morning, the Japanese attacked Midway Island.
Japan has,
therefore, undertaken a surprise offensive extending throughout the Pacific
area. The facts of yesterday and today speak for themselves. The people of the
United States have already formed their opinions and thoroughly understand the
implications to the very life and safety of our nation.
As Commander
in Chief of the Army and Navy, I have directed that all measures be taken for
our defense. However, always will our whole nation remember the character of
the onslaught against us.
No matter how
long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people
in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory.
I believe
that I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that
we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make it very sure
that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us. Hostilities exist.
There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our
interests are in grave danger.
With
confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounded determination of our people,
we will gain the inevitable triumph—so help us, God.
I ask that
the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on
Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United
States and the Japanese empire.”
(President-Roosevelt, 1941)
SOME OF THE
CRITICAL POINTS IN THE SPEECH ARE:
Japan intended the attack as a preventive action to keep the U.S. Pacific Fleet from interfering
All eight U.S. Navy battleships were damaged, with four sunk.
All but the USS Arizona were raised, and six were returned to service and went on to fighting the war.
The Japanese also sank or damaged three cruisers,
three destroyers,
an anti-aircraft training ship
one minelayer.
One hundred eighty-eight U.S. aircraft destroyed;
2,403Americans killed
1,178 others were wounded.
PARALLEL COMPARISON OF THE UNPROVOKED AGGRESSION
The Soviet Union November
30, 1939-40, initiated the aggressive war against Finland.
Moreover, the
1941 Pearl Harbor surprise attack by Japan.
Which of the
two events came first? Could it be that the US Allies indifference and inaction
to the Nazi Germany & USSR aggression in 1939-41 was viewed by Japan as
justifiable? Free for all? Using the logic of, what is good for one, is
suitable for all?
Which of the two claimed
more lives? Caused more damage?
The Imperial Super States,
France, Britain, Russia and the United States have highly polished porcelain
over their national pride ego. Once that pride is cracked the declaration of
war follows. The smaller States are much humbler; they have human skin in the
game. They are often bruised, lacerated and scarred, but they must keep going
regardless and suffer silently because the Imperials use the Victors justice to
manipulate the ordinary people of the land and the smaller states.
How does the above
destruction compare with the aggressive war against peace? That the Soviet
Union committed on Poland September 1939? Moreover, the aggressive war against
peace in Finland in November 1939? Was not the Soviet Union aggression
sufficiently extreme to reveal their intentions to exploit others territory and
property, to deny people their right to life, liberty, and property?
Here are the facts:
Soviets cross
over 1100 + km border,
Used 21
divisions, totaling some 450,000 men in the invasion
Air bombed
the capital city Helsinki,
Inflicting
substantial damage and casualties to cities. 1000 civilians died.
months war
25,904 dead or missing
43,557
wounded
800–1,100
captured
20–30 tanks
destroyed
62 aircraft
destroyed
70,000 total
human casualties
President ofFinland, Kyösti Kallio New Year speech 1940, four weeks after the AggressiveSoviet war against peace. The following page is a copy of a speech script, fromthe New Year 1940, given by the President of Finland, Kyösti Kallio. Nationalburden of the aggressive war at the East front lines. The aggressive war thatthe Soviet Stalin had initiated on November 30. 1939.”
The President of Finland Kyösti Kallio. (1937-1940). To Suomi people and friends!
“As
President of the Republic, it has been a tradition of mine that on the first
day of the year to send out greetings message through our radio broadcasts, to
create a brief overview of our societies and economic development. This time I
have to give up on the practice because now there is only one thing that is on
our mind, to rescue our fatherland from the attacker’s reach that has struck
its claws on our governing body. Our bodies. The old imperialist Russia,
throughout history, has been a threat to the Finnish people, once again
manifested its old instincts and without the slightest legitimate reason to
attack our country.
Russian
Tsar Imperialism has collapsed, but the imperialist practices have been
inherited to its current rulers, even though their teacher guru Lenin declared
when he came into power to be respectful of the sovereignty and
self-determination of the peoples on the fringes of the old Tsar territory.
In
practice, it has turned out to be words only. Initially, the sovereignty of the
peoples who had the national strength to rise and watch over their
independence, and they did gain independence, but now the Soviet Union leaders
appear to be strong enough to demand influence over those countries as well.
(growing military strength emboldens Soviet union leaders to demand control of
the neighbors).
Such a
request even though initially was cautious, was also made to Finland. From the
experience of centuries, Finland was aware of what it was all about.
Peace-loving-People like Finland, it tried to get the requests presented to us
through negotiation, however, the apparent requests of the Soviet Union turned
out to be demands on Finland’s own security and interest were to be relocated
and diminished.
The Soviet
Union, as usual, made its claim under the guise of security of Leningrad, but
in reality, it was the transport connections between the Gulf of Finland and
Petsamo fjord control and disposal, weakening of Finland’s defense capabilities
in the Gulf of Finland, Karelian Isthmus and the Port of Petsamo.
None of
the Leningrad’s insecurity could have been the truth of the matter because
already in Tartu’s peace agreement it was agreed that Finland could not fortify
Leningrad region, or the islands along the waterway and the shoreline area near
Leningrad, nor the Finnish fishermen’s island area at the Port of Petsamo.
In the
negotiations, the Soviet representatives acknowledged these guarantees as
sufficient about Finland but required additional guarantees that no superpower
could take advantage of Finland’s territory in a potential war against Russia.
That was also an excuse because Finland is always there openly said that it
wanted to stay away from the conflicts between the great powers and laments
himself against every foreign power that seeks to offend his sovereignty.
Russia’s
invasion of Finland when the negotiations were still unfinished. Moreover, they
delivered a demand for the appointment of the Communist government to our
unconquerable country, shows that it had been presumptuously decided to occupy
Finland and at the same time to engulf the country with the spirit of the
Bolsheviks politics, when the initial requests as they were, was not granted.
Our
country was in a state of readiness that Russia did not get us by surprise,
even though there is a non-fortified border over 1,000 kilometers. They attacked
the border right away in some points, not caring less, and completely ignoring
the agreements that we had with them, e.g., the resolution of mutual disputes
by peaceful means.
Ruthlessly
attacking using airplanes on the capital and other settlements by killing
children, women and other civilians. Through these acts, the Soviet Union
revealed at the beginning of its agenda. This raw assault brought together the
front the whole of the Finnish people, whose national self- esteem and the
blood felt love for the liberty of our independence, which every year we are
increasingly strengthened.
Our
defense is intact and indivisible. Our Parliament has unanimously drawn up laws
that show its long-awaited consideration today. Defense work does not only
involve men but also women who are sacrificing themselves; the versatile
operation is of great value. The proportion of women today more noticeable when
they are receiving, and part of the refugees and relocating process with
incredible pride and with serenity adapted to both sides of the new conditions.
During
this great trial of our nation, we have the consolation among us, cooperation
and unity. It seems as if the people of Finland in the great distress found
themselves. Moreover, that is why we need to rejoice. The sacrifice we now need
everywhere is of high divine origin.
Sacrifice
His work and resources for the neighbor is significant, but to sacrifice
himself, the life of his country, and For his people is still much higher. In
front of its vulnerability, we are silent, and we humble to thank God for great
suffering and sorrows to awaken new life values.
We
sincerely regret that we have been subjected to warfare that requires victims.
But we have no other way to protect our independence than a sacrificial battle
for our existence sake.
A couple
of weeks ago, I had the opportunity to greet our superiors ‘officers and crews
and express our gratitude to our peoples for the different positions that stand
for the protection of our home and the whole motherland.
These two
fateful weeks that we have since lived have given us their own for our people
and the whole world, new testimonies of the battle readiness of our defense
Forces, perseverance and above all the unity and cooperation they have shown on
land, at sea, and in the air. On behalf of our people, without mentioning
anyone individually, or forgetting anyone, for everyone to our country
defenders are heroic and deserves deep praise.
This equally grateful greeting is also presented to those wounded at the frontlines, laying in the hospitals from their acts of courage. Which I have pointed out they are carrying the hard fate continually remembering their comrades who are on the front lines.
However,
above all, we take a moment of silence to give respect to the many who have
sacrificed their lives for our common homeland. Moreover, you, mothers,
fathers, spouses, children, brothers and sisters, who are doing heavy work at
home you will know this during this fateful Season, with greetings with the
consent of knowing that every hand you know, that this is now about the
existence of our nation and the future of which we all are Responsible for. Let
us continue to carry our burdens each in place with the same unity and bravery.
Every work for the motherland is now essential and necessary.”
According to the Polish Institute of National Remembrance, Soviet occupation between 1939 and 1941 resulted in the death of 150,000 and deportation of 320,000 of Polish citizens, when all who were deemed dangerous to the Soviet regime were subject to Sovietization, forced resettlement, imprisonment in labor camps (the Gulags) or murdered, like the Polish nationals in the Katyn massacre.
The Katyn massacre was prompted by NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria’s proposal to execute all captive members of the Polish officer corps, dated March 5, 1940, approved by the Politburo of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, including its leader, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov. The number of victims is estimated at 22,000.
The victims were executed in the Katyn Forest in Soviet Russia, the Kalinin and Kharkiv prisons, and elsewhere. Of the total killed:
about 8,000 were officers imprisoned during the 1939 Soviet invasion of Poland
6,000 were police officers
Polish intelligentsia that the Soviets deemed to be “intelligence agents”
gendarmes
landowners
saboteurs
factory owners
lawyers
officials
and priests.”
Would the Katyn massacre genocide, and war crimes be sufficient reason to declare war on those that perpetrated the crimes against humanity?
If the crime were done against Britain, United States, France or the Soviet Union, it is reasonable to think that such unprovoked attack would be viewed as an insult to their nation. The human and material loss would be sufficient reason to declare war on the perpetrators.
After the loss of the Pearl Harbour battleships, Navy vessels, the human loss of 2,403 Americans lives, and 1,178 wounded was a sufficient reason for American leaders to declare war on Japan.
Is the American and British Western logic and reasoning at fault to declare war on those that attack them? Is it not a matter of Imperialist National pride? That they would defend themselves if anyone dares to attack them?
The above conclusion is consistent to their logic, that which is valid and justified war for the Imperialists.
Why then would it not be valid and justified for the smaller nations to do likewise? If they have the power or the opportunity to do so? It is consistent with the logic and the rational, that the Western Allies used. In defense of their natural rights.
Finland defended it’s government and people by a preemptive strike, hitting back at the despotic Soviet leadership, the war criminals, the perpetrators of the war against peace in 1939 to 1940. There is no rational reason why they would not do. The decision was based on the Spirit of the Natural Law, and the natural rights, defending the people of the land.
Finland military took back the territory that rightfully belonged to the 400,000 civilians inhabiting the Finnish Karelian municipality. The Karelian civilians were forced to evacuate in 1939. On the other hand, Joseph Stalin and the USSR military Generals committed war crimes during 1939-1940, they initiated the aggressive war against peace, in Poland and Finland.
The USSR was operating under the Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression (1939-1941). They were committed to a conspiracy to do crime against innocent civilians, to the Baltic States and Finland. Where is the whistle? And who will blow it? War against peace is a war crime.
Thousands of people perished due to the Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression. The Soviets committed genocide in 1940, 22,000 Polish National prisoners were executed within two months.
It was an easy transition from the 1917 to 1939 Bolsheviks lawlessness worldview and Joseph Stalin track record of anarchy and extreme violence.
At the same time, France, England, United States were indifferent, and some 14 months later they became allies with those war criminals and providing the USSR with enormous amounts of military support.
UNITED STATES ALONE ASSISTED STALIN WITH US$160,000,000,000 (160 Billion in today’s money) MILITARY AND MATERIAL AID TO JOSEPH STALIN
JOSEPH STALIN WAS A PROFESSIONAL CRIMINAL
The Allied forces leaders were blind or repressing the true spiritual reality of the USSR leadership.
What were the Allied forces thinking? Of the Russian events in 1917, 1922, 1936-38, 1939 -1941? There is an enormous river of blood flowing from Russia, during that time period. Did anyone in France, England, and the United States consider the Spirit of the Natural Law? Why would they become allies with such record of lawlessness? (1917 -1941).
What have we learned from history?
The Imperialists, the Super States and the dictators have one thing in common, their own self interest. They do not respect the Spirit of the Natural Law. Therefore, it is reasonable to project into the future, that the Imperialsits, the Super States and the dictators will be driven by the same motives that have driven them in the past history. Making pacts and attempting to outmanouver their enemies and economical competitors in order to come out on top. At the same time they turn their back on the Spirit of the Natural Law, and become the violent aggressors themselves.
The Nemesis Book discusses the nature of the fight for the survival and the independence of the Suomi people as its central theme. However, the relatively short 500-year period of Finland was not short of foreign Imperial encroachments and animosity caused by covetousness. It was not a time period protected by human self-constraint, respect for the intrinsic human value, or respect for the Spirit of the Natural Law. There were many external foreign political and carnal brute forces invading from the outside. Human predators sought to exploit soft targets. Imperial super state military invasions by Sweden, Russia, and the Soviet Union, using military force as a license for self-imposed rules and domination, coveting to take over the cultural assets which the locals had invested in and worked towards for over 2000 years. Imperials offered autonomous formality, but progressively worked to sideline the heart of the Suomi culture through the foreign nationalistic Russification process of the local cultural roots of the Suomi people’s national identity and destiny.
Before the King of Sweden started taking an interest in the territory of Finland around 12th Century, Finnish-language speaking people and other indigenous tribes from Lapland’s nomadic Sami peoples regularly visited and lived along the shores of the Bothnia Sea, the central lakes, and Lake Ladoga. During the early language formation years, people living in the areas along the shore of the Gulf of Finland to Karelian Isthmus, North Karelia, shared a culture and a speaking language which eventually evolved into the Suomi language.
Religion came with the messengers, and the reformation started by Luther in the early 16th century reached the people of Sweden and Finland. The Reformation enlightened the people’s minds and gave rise to the Finnish written language development. Mikael Agricola (1510–1557) brought the Reformation to Finland and developed the Finnish speaking language into written text. The New Testament was translated into Finnish in 1548. The entire Bible appeared in the Finnish language in 1642.
The Spirit of Natural Law. The right to life, liberty, and property. The Natural Law protected the spiritually intuitive people in their Natural State before the population explosion on earth. Following Imperialistic slavery and totalitarianism people have joined civil society willingly through consent to accept a social responsibility contract.
History is full of irresponsible leaders of people, fueled by false worldviews and false life philosophies; leaders who have made a grandiose slaughter of humanity during the period of 1900-1953. Globally, the attitudes on the intrinsic value of human life are still uncertain and hold a precarious virtue, an area where the global power politic leaders avoid, deny, suppress and cheat on.
The news of the Russian revolution reached Finland in 1917. The majority of the law-respecting people in Finland were horrified by the Russian revolution’s rebellion, lawlessness, and anarchy—by the spirit of the Nemesis overtaking the rule of law. Because the people were spiritually enlightened by the spirit of grace, they understood the significance of the spirit of the Natural Law, and the meaning of the rule of law. It is a foundational truth for a stable society, a foundational truth in all of the law-respecting societies of the world.
The Nemesis eBook is available at the Amazon Store.
“There was no respect for the Spirit of the natural Law, no respect for the natural rights or respect for the rule of law. No one was defending true justice or declaring the same Spirit of the Law globally during 1900 to 1950.
The spirit of anarchy raged against the Spirit of the Natural Law and propagated violence. With rage the rebellious Bolsheviks hated those that believed in human rights, and the society rule of law. The Bolsheviks resorted to extremes and demanded the highest seat of authority in the Russian government for themselves.
Imperial England generally presumed that they had the moral high ground as they planted their Imperial colonies world wide, based on their privileged reputation and royalty status. Moreover, if any nation dared to offend them militarily, then that country was condemned, and not only the country that directly offended them militarily, but also any other country that had an alliance and mutually respectful relationship with the country, in their economic interest. The pride of the imperials leads them to hubris.”
INWARD-LOOKING IMPERIALISTS
The Allied forces especially England were very narrow-minded, inwardlooking, prejudiced, insular, utterly blind to the facts of reality and experience, that Finland and the Baltic States had regarding Russia from the previous 500 years. How could the British leaders be so pride filled smug and delusional that the independent States would put aside their country interest? Moreover, neglect their own militarily self-defense for the sake of England’s prestige and foreign policies? The level of selfishness and indifference was absurd.
The Nordic countries and the Baltic people had to survive from early 1307 to 1917. For 500 years, the Nordic countries in a harmonious working relationship and has remained so to this day. The most predominant military aggressor during those 500 years was the Russian expansionism and Stalinism. There was much conflict between Russia and Sweden. Russia has persistently pushed the boundaries westwards since 1807.
Europe has been like a material cash magnet for Moscow . Russian has often been desperate to compete with the Western materialistic economic successes and compromised the integrity of their national soul in the process.
The enemy of Finland people’s Independence for the last 200 years has been Russia, not Germany. Historically there was much common ground between Finland and Germany. In the industries and tourism interest generally and the State Lutheran Church teachings.
The relationship between the two countries developed early years through the Christian teaching and interpretations of the biblical doctrine of Martin Luther. Both countries rejected the Catholic heresies of the middle ages.
“Martin Luther, (10 November 1483 – 18 February 1546) was a German professor of theology, composer, priest, monk, and a seminal figure in the Protestant Reformation. Luther came to reject several teachings and practices of the Roman Catholic Church. He strongly disputed the Catholic view on indulgences. They escorted Luther to the security of the Wartburg Castle at Eisenach. During his stay at Wartburg, which he referred to as “my Patmos,” Luther translated the New Testament from Greek into German and poured out doctrinal and polemical writings. The Wartburg is a castle built initially in the Middle Ages. the place where Martin Luther translated the New Testament of the Bible into German.”
(Luther, 2018)
A written agreement between the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland and The German Evangelical Church. The year 1500. The theological foundation.
“Conscious of its common roots in the history of the Western Church and the reformation of the 16th century. The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland and Germany evangelical church by the Lutheran member churches and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Finland have a religious connection with the Lutheran World Federation as members, reinforce the existing and practically implemented connection.”
PIETISM
“Pietism, from the word piety, was an influential movement in Lutheranism that combined its emphasis on Biblical doctrine with the Reformed emphasis on individual piety and living a vigorous Christian life. Pietism originated in modern Germany in the late 17th century with the work of Philipp Spener, a Lutheran theologian whose emphasis on personal transformation through spiritual rebirth and renewal, personal devotion and piety laid the foundations for the movement. Pietism spread from Germany to Switzerland and the rest of German-speaking Europe. Scandinavia and the Baltics (where it was heavily influential, leaving a permanent mark on the region’s dominant Lutheranism, with figures like Hans Nielsen Hauge in Norway. Peter Spaak, and Carl Olof Rosenius in Sweden, Katarina Asplund in Finland, and Barbara von Krüdener in the Baltics), and the rest of Europe. It was further taken to North America, primarily by German and Scandinavian immigrants. There, it influenced Protestants of other ethnic backgrounds, taking part in the 18thcentury foundation of Evangelicalism, a vibrant movement within Protestantism that today has some 300 million followers.”
Pietism. (encyclopedia, 2018)
Early 1900, Finland government sought help from Germany for the expulsion of the Bolsheviks from Finland, at a time when the Bolsheviks attempted to influence and take charge of Finland society, just as they did later in Russia 1917. To understand the dilemma, of being occupied for 100 years, from 1807 to 1917 Finland was not permitted to have an independent defense force.
The Russian Grand Duchy governors were determined to subjugate small countries; the russification process developed early in the interest of Russian expansionism. The Soviet Union continued to use russification as a Morphosis process in Finland and the Baltic States territory. So that the ordinary people of the land and the independent constitutions would morph from the original people’s cultural identity, values, and the government constitution into a different political species and become loyal to a foreign constitution.
Why would they plan such sinister corkscrew conspiracy? They were not on a leisure holiday; they were on an assignment. They were hungry to exploit others national resources, government offices, people, land, and territory. In other words, coveting everything from the high offices, and the transport, to the silk stockings and the kitchen sink. So, doing subjugating the peoples to become an extension of the larger Russia, with the same purpose and objectives as the communist worldview and life philosophy 1922 -1991.
The Western world by large does not understand the nature of the East European spiritual battle or the diabolical source that powers it into lawlessness. It has a spiritual source, which people yield to and empower it. The power of Satan that has been raging for the last 500 years.
The dots are everywhere from early 1900 to 1991. It starts with the core lawlessness, rebellion, and anarchy. To steal away authority from legitimate spiritual authority. As a cause, who has been stealing? Killing? Moreover, destroying? How difficult is it to join those dots to the past 100-year history? The cause was from 1900-1922. Moreover, from 1939-1945. The wild conspiracy between Germany and Soviet Russian leaders to pillage East Europe. It was the spirit of Satan with temptations that got into the heads of Joseph Stalin, with totalitarian state atheism, under the guise of pseudo-socialism, and Adolf Hitler with the totalitarian Nazi regime.
In so doing, Satan was able to cause extreme destruction to people, animals, land environment, and human civil society. All in the spirit of animosity, against the Creator of life, Elohim.
Spiritual forces are continually influencing and tempting leader’s mind egos, to take sides with the lawlessness of the Nemesis. Testing the borders and the will of the people seeking out broken walls. The nature of the spiritual battles on the borders of countries, and humanity made in the image of God, clearly described in the Bible.
“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.”
Ephesians 6:12. (Paul, 2018)
What are they talking on? Who is the ruler?
Satan is the prince of darkness. Who is the authority? Demonic spiritual forces. Powers of the dark underworld.
Satan is the Nemesis of humanity, the devil, and his demon host. That can only cause harm to humanity and other destructive actions on earth, through tempting people to do lawlessness, to do evil to other people. It takes people that are given to the demon spirit’s temptations and influence. There is a mark of Satan in those minds that partake in the spirit of the lawlessness, those that are guided by the spirit of Satan, to do his bidding.
In so doing making war against the kingdom of God, Elohim.
By reason alone, immoral actions can be forensically inspected and identified as being irrational, because it is a severe error of moral judgment. How is it possible? Why would ambitious politicians, government leaders, servants of people’s society, make such severe errors in moral judgment? Violating the principles found in the Bill of Rights? The spirit of the Natural Law. In conflict with the principles of International Law. Moreover, and to deny any wrongdoing?
How is it possible? The dark side of the coin causes it. The deception of the Nemesis, the demon spirits that get into the hearts and minds of leaders and uses them for evil on earth. That is also the blind corner, the failure to see and understand the spiritual reality of moral values. Causing spiritual vacuum in the mind and heart, with the absence of the absolute moral code.
No animal of the wilderness would divert from natural to such extreme behavior, from their natural habitat. Humans are commanded by God in the Bible to behave more like humans, and less like animals. Dictators have surpassed the behavior of wild animals by far, considering the many millions of innocent lives that their actions have destroyed. What is behind it all? It is the influence of the Nemesis, the devil and the spirit of Satan, that empowers the dictator’s lust after political and military power, as if it was their highest throne and destiny in life, at the feet of Satan.
One explanation is that the dictator’s minds were blinded by the deceitful temptations of the Nemesis. They became filled by his spirit and therefore deceived into believing lies. They trusted their mind and gave no respect to the Creator of Life. They certainly did not believe or respect in the natural human rights or respect the sanctity of human life. The covetousness of Imperial Russia and the USSR expansionism was viewed by the people as the Russian bear eating up the smaller neighbors on the fringes. Who would find any evidence? Alternatively, have a voice to call for justice? In a lawless world, where rebellion and anarchy are often voices heard the loudest, with the most authority, by servants of the devil.
Welcome to the dark dungeons of the Nemesis. Fighting for the cause of the prince of darkness called Satan. That diabolically manipulates people’s minds, denying them of life, liberty, and destiny. In 1914-17 the Brits had an enemy, but because they were so pre-occupied with their royalty status and pride, they could not see the larger picture, how the Nemesis had been active in the life of the East European States over the 200 years since 1807. What are the priorities between nations when dealing with others Internationally? It is most commonly commerce and trade. Should the priority always be economics? Chasing after the Trade and Goods markets? Not really! They are a secondary priority in life. The most greedy people will fight and start wars over territory.
(PART. 1),
Adopted by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948
(UN, 2018)
“The Declaration consists of a preamble and 30 articles, setting forth the human rights and fundamental freedoms to which all men and women, everywhere in the world, are entitled, without any discrimination.
Article 1, which lays down the philosophy on which the Declaration is based, reads:
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
The article thus defines the underlying assumptions of the Declaration: that the right to liberty and equality is man’s birthright and cannot be alienated: and that, because man is a rational and moral being. He is different from other creatures on earth and therefore entitled to individual rights and freedoms which other creatures do not enjoy.
Article 2, which sets out the fundamental principle of equality and nondiscrimination as regards the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms, forbids “distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status”.
Article 3, the first cornerstone of the Declaration, proclaims the right to life, liberty, and security of person -a right essential to the enjoyment of all other rights.
This article introduces articles 4 to 21, in which other civil and political rights are set out, including freedom from slavery and servitude; freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law; the right to an adequate judicial remedy; freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention or exile; the right to a fair trial and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal; the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty; freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence; freedom of movement and residence; the right of asylum; the right to a nationality; the right to marry and to found a family; the right to own property; freedom of thought, conscience and religion; freedom of opinion and expression; the right to peaceful assembly and association; and the right to take part in the government of one’s country and to equal access to public service in one’s country.” (UN, 2018)
Quote: The Nemesis Book 2018
THE 1900-1917 USSR VIOLATED THE ABOVE PRINCIPLES OF THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS.
“That is the core reason for the mystery of conflict and wars.
It is willful lawlessness and disrespect for the sanctity of life.
Joseph Stalin life would have been much more meaningful and rewarding to him eternally as a human being made in the image of God if he had stayed at the seminary where he started his theological studies. Potential to know what the will of God for him, and for humanity in general. He could have also found personal salvation, and become righteous before God, living in submissive obedience to the Creator of life, through the redemption of Yeshua Hamashiach.
LENIN A JEW?
“The declassification of documents since the collapse of the Soviet Communist tyranny in 1991 has brought irrefutable proof that Lenin’s maternal great-grandfather was a shtetl Jew named Moshko Blank.
Whether or not Lenin himself was aware of this piece of information is uncertain, but by the time of his death in 1924 his sister had possession of the facts—and, by order of the Central Committee of the Communist party, was forced to keep them secret. The order held firm until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the early 1990’s”.
(Wisse, 2018) My Jewish learning.com
KARL MARX
“Marx was ethnically Jewish. His maternal grandfather was a Dutch rabbi, while his paternal line had supplied Trier’s rabbis since 1723, a role taken by his grandfather Meier Halevi Marx”.
(Encyclopedia, Karl Marx, 2018)
Karl Marx with Jewish ancestry would have served people much better by believing in the teaching of the Torah, instead of being a false prophet of humanism, teaching the people of the world atheism.
The Bolsheviks failed their calling in life, by their obstinate self-will, willfully trusting their own understanding, more than the written word of God. That is the difference.
Proverbs 3:5-6 (NIV)
“Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight.”
SURE FOUNDATIONS
The Spirit of the Natural Law is a sure foundation for the rule of law, and for the spirit of the law respecting societies. Without accepting the principles of the Spirit of the Natural Law, you cannot have legal principles for the International Law. It is only the Spirit of the Natural Law that provides true justice that is impartial to all people worldwide.
People that deny the Spirit of the Natural Law do so because their will and their spirits are not willing to submit to the impartial Spirit of the God-given Natural Law principles. The truth, similarly a convicted lawbreaker will often repress or deny having broken any laws. Many simply, will not accept the spirit of the law that commands the human will to submit to the transcendent origin of the Spirit of the Natural Law. The same point made earlier; the law is not a material entity, it is immaterial. Transcendental Spirit of the Natural Law. In the beginning, Elohim, the Creator of life.
Meaning to use the intellect and the will to make the right choice, consciously to do the right thing. It is a matter of being consciously aware, and to make an intelligent, conscious choice, in a finite material world.
Mostly, it is not a tug-a-war between the human will and human law, but rather a battle between human intellect, will and the human carnal nature, pulling each way, and not giving the due respect to the Spirit of the Natural Law.The intellect should be informed and enlightened to accept the knowledge of the more significant, the prior, Spirit of the Natural Law.
The old analogy of the cart, the driver or the horse? Which entity acts as the engine? Which has the more significant role in steering? the metaphysical Spirit of the Law, or the subjective human will? Which is the right logical order? Which one leads? Which one follows? And what purpose does it serve? Do the spiritual laws serve human random behavior? Alternatively, does the random human behavior learn to submit to the metaphysical Spirit of the Natural Law? And learn the right priority, and to submit the human will to the higher priority order of God’s will. It is like a mini Copernican Revolution of the discovery of the other, the other being greater. The other being the will and the Spirit of Elohim.
It is a question of information, knowledge, understanding, and cognitive intelligence. A knowledge problem, with the intellect, that drives the individual self-determination. Almost 2000 years ago, 12 disciples made a free choice, after they were asked to follow Yeshua from Nazarene, they were invited to follow Jesus. The 12 to be disciples intuitively sensed that it was an invitation of a lifetime, worth taking. So, they committed themselves to follow the teaching Rabbi called Yeshua. It changed their lives forever.
The global community has always been a violent place, ruled by violent individuals. It is no different in the last 100 years. Instead of accepting the Spirit of the Natural Law as a reliable guide for civil government. Many dictator leaders have attempted to shut down the spirit of the Natural Law and re-write the meta-narrative of the rules for human existence, according to the dictator’s political ambitions, self-seeking glory, egomaniac fantasies military power trips and who knows what other imaginary extremities, like global domination.”
Defending the Spirit of the Natural Law based, Society Rule of Law.
“Germany was a Godsend to Finland in early 1900, providing means of support in the fight against the Russian Bolsheviks lawlessness. The Bolsheviks perpetuated a spirit of anarchy that would not stay in the Russian skin, and would spill out over the borders of Russia”.
“Finland was discreetly requesting and petitioning behind the Russian Governor General’s back for weapons from Germany, for self-defense purposes. Germany also secretly providing military training for the young university students of Finland. They were getting training to become organized military officers, in the Finland’s fight against the Bolsheviks spirit of lawlessness. The rising tide of anarchy, that became the future stronghold of State Atheism in the USSR. It was a blatant anti-God wall built by the spirit of the Nemesis. Blocking out the Spirit of the Natural Law from Russian people, to constrain the Spirit of the Natural Law, from being activated in the human souls”.
“Similarly 20 years later, Germany providing vital military equipment in the fight against Stalin’s totalitarian regime war against peace, 1939-45. Finland purchasing German military hardware, equipment, with the strong spirited will to remain independent, Finland was able to defend against USSR aggressive invasion attempts in 1939-45”.
“The manipulative demands by Moscow politics were far-reaching, into the Baltic States and Finland. They were denied and constrained from developing robust self-defense. The constraints came from several levels”.
“Unlike the Baltic States, that was occupied for 50 years. That was the sad scenario for the Baltic States, to be occupied for 50 years by the Allied forces partners in crime. A severe error of judgment, and a blind corner beyond the allied forces conscience. 1939-1953”.
From The Nemesis Book 2018. Author Victor Leinonen.
